Análisis de Análisis de Ciclo de Vida de Ciclo de Vida de autobuses urbanos autobuses urbanos Euro IV

Abstract

The Euro 4 standard sets a pollutant emissions limit respect to NOx and particulate matter

emissions that have forced to automobile manufacturers and, specifi cally, to engine

manufacturers, at make studies about the engine performance and exhaust aftertreatment

technology that have resulted in systems radically different. Specifi cally systems presented

have been two, on one side, engines that reduce the temperature inside combustion chamber,

by exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) for NOx reduction and incorporate a particulate fi lter in the

exhaust and, on the other side, engines operating at high temperatures to reduce particulate

matter, and incorporate a selective catalytic system (SCR) for NOx reduction using urea.

This paper presents a comparative study about using both systems in an urban bus, to

determinate the best behavior against the energy requirement and greenhouse gas emissions

(GEI) by means a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). Furthermore, the study includes a comparative

analysis of different fuels: diesel, biodiesel (B100) and a blended biodiesel at 20% (B20) (Well

to Tank analysis) and the environmental impact due to the use of these fuels in the bus (Tank

to Wheel analysis). For this purpose, data on fuel consumption and pollutant emissions were

acquired by tests in real driving cycle, using a measurement equipment on board the bus.

Also has been evaluated the environmental impact of the manufacturing and recycling process

of the urban bus tested, as well as, of the exhaust after treatment systems (where the

production and recycling of precious metals that are used as a catalysts, has been considered).

The data on energy requirement and GEI emissions of different process that are involved in the

LCA stages of an urban bus , have been obtained from industry, scientifi c publication and data

bases as GaBi 4 and GEMIS.

Among the most relevant results of this comparative analysis has found that the LCA of the

SCR+Urea technology has an energy consumption and GEI emissions higher than the LCA of

the EGR+DPF technology, mainly due to AdBlue production and supply (formed from deionized

water and urea), that this technology requires for its continuing treatment of the exhaust gases.

However, the bus that includes this technology generates, in use, lower environmental impact.